[Mini-Module] Cyber Bullying Laws In India

COURSE DESCRIPTION: This module provides an overview of cyber bullying laws in India, giving learners an understanding of the existing legal framework. By familiarizing themselves with the relevant legislation, such as the Information Technology Act, learners can comprehend the legal context within which cyber bullying is addressed in India. Additionally, the module highlights the roles … Continue reading [Mini-Module] Cyber Bullying Laws In India

T.M.A. Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka (2002)

TMA Pai Foundation v. State of Karnataka is a significant case law in India that deals with the issue of the autonomy and regulatory authority of private educational institutions. The case was heard by the Supreme Court of India and the judgment was delivered on April 30, 2002.

[Mini Module] Cannabis-Hemp Laws in India

Course Description: This course provides an in-depth understanding of the legal framework governing cannabis and hemp in India. The course covers the history, current status, and future of cannabis and hemp laws in India, including the constitutional provisions, relevant laws and regulations, licensing and permitting, medical cannabis, and emerging trends in the industry. Learning Outcomes: … Continue reading [Mini Module] Cannabis-Hemp Laws in India

Mafatlal Industries Ltd. v. Union of India (1996)

Mafatlal Industries v. Union of India is a landmark case in Indian constitutional law that deals with the principles of natural justice and the right to a fair hearing. The case was heard by a five-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India and the judgment was delivered on 26 July 1996.

Indra Sawhney v. Union of India (1992)

Indra Sawhney and Ors v Union of India and Ors [1992] is a landmark case in Indian constitutional law, commonly known as the "Mandal Commission case." The case dealt with the issue of reservations in government jobs and educational institutions for socially and educationally backward classes of citizens, also known as Other Backward Classes (OBCs).

Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India and Ors. (1981)

Minerva Mills Ltd and Ors v Union of India and Ors is another landmark case in the constitutional history of India. The case was heard by a bench of 5 judges of the Supreme Court of India and it was decided on May 21, 1980. The case is significant because it involved a challenge to the power of the Indian Parliament to amend the Constitution of India.

Quick Brief of the Supreme Court Suggestion made to the Bar Council of India on revamping Legal Education in India.

INTRODUCTION: The Right to practice any profession is one of the fundamental rights of the individual. Irony is, Bar Council of India wants candidates to resign from their current occupation while seeking enrolment as Advocates. Some people couldn't give up their occupation to get enrolment due to their financial crisis. Another thing is that bar … Continue reading Quick Brief of the Supreme Court Suggestion made to the Bar Council of India on revamping Legal Education in India.

Decoding the Labour & Precarious Lives: Delivery Workers and Online Shopping in India

Introduction One of the prime factors driving shoppers to shop online apart from the huge discounts is the attribute of convenience entailed in online shopping in the form of goods getting delivered at the very doorstep of the customer. Essentially then, the entire edifice of e-retail is brought to its realization by the section of … Continue reading Decoding the Labour & Precarious Lives: Delivery Workers and Online Shopping in India

Quick Brief of the judgement by Supreme Court reiterating that few affected employees are sufficient in service matters, non- joining of all parties is not fatal.

The Competent Authority and the State committed a serious error of law in determining the seniority list merely on the basis of the date of receipt of the three select lists arising out of the same selection.